Cheapest Cloud GPUs: A Comprehensive Guide

Introduction

The recent surge in demand for generative AI and large language models has pushed GPU prices sky‑high. Many small teams and startups were priced out of mainstream cloud providers, triggering an explosion of alternative GPU clouds and multi-cloud strategies. In this guide you will learn how to navigate the cloud GPU market, identify the best bargains without compromising performance, and why Clarifai’s compute orchestration layer makes it easier to manage heterogeneous hardware.

Quick Digest

• Northflank, Thunder Compute and RunPod are among the most affordable A100/H100 providers; spot instances can drop costs further.
  
  
• Hidden charges matter: data egress can add $0.08–0.12 per GB, storage $0.10–0.30 per GB, and idle time burns money.
  
  
• Clarifai’s compute orchestration routes jobs across multiple clouds, automatically selecting the most cost-effective GPU and offering local runners for offline inference.
  
  
• New hardware such as NVIDIA H200, B200 and AMD MI300X deliver more memory (up to 192 GB) and bandwidth, shifting price/performance dynamics.
  
  
• Expert insight: use a mix of on‑demand, spot and Bring‑Your‑Own‑Compute (BYOC) to balance cost, availability and control.
  
  

Understanding Cloud GPU Pricing and Cost Factors

What drives GPU cloud pricing and what hidden costs should you watch out for?

Several variables determine how much you pay for cloud GPUs. Besides the obvious per‑hour rate, you’ll need to account for memory size, network bandwidth, region, and supply–demand fluctuations. The GPU model matters too: the NVIDIA A100 and H100 are still widely used for training and inference, but newer chips like the H200 and AMD MI300X offer larger memory and may have different pricing tiers.

Pricing models fall into three main categories: on‑demand, reserved and spot/preemptible. On‑demand gives you flexibility but typically the highest price. Reserved or committed use requires longer commitments (often a year) but offers discounts. Spot instances let you bid for unused capacity; they can be 60–90 % cheaper but come with eviction risk.

Beyond the headline hourly rate, cloud platforms often charge for ancillary services. According to GMI Cloud’s analysis, egress fees range from $0.08–0.12 per GB, storage from $0.10–$0.30 per GB, and high‑performance networking can add 10–20 % to your bill. Idle GPUs also incur cost; turning off machines when not in use and batching workloads can significantly reduce waste.

Other hidden factors include software licensing, framework compatibility and data locality. Some providers bundle licensing costs into the hourly rate, while others require separate contracts. For inference workloads, concurrency limits and request‑based billing may influence cost more than raw GPU price.

Expert Insights

• High‑memory GPUs like the H100 80 GB and H200 141 GB often command higher prices due to memory capacity and bandwidth; however, they can handle larger models which reduces the need for model parallelism.
  
  
• Regional pricing differences are significant. US and Singapore data centers often cost less than European regions due to energy prices and local taxes.
  
  
• Factor in data transfer between providers. Moving data out of a cloud to train on another can quickly erase any savings from cheaper compute.
  
  
• Always monitor utilization; a GPU that runs at 40 % utilization effectively costs 1.5× what it seems.
  
  

Benchmarking the Cheapest Cloud GPU Providers

Which GPU providers deliver the lowest cost per hour without sacrificing reliability?

Many providers advertise “cheapest GPU cloud,” but prices and reliability vary widely. The table below summarises per‑hour pricing for the popular NVIDIA A100 across selected providers. Thunder Compute stands out with a $0.66/hr A100 40 GB rate and promises up to 80 % savings compared with Google Cloud or AWS. Northflank’s per‑second billing and automatic spot optimisation make it the most competitive among mainstream providers; its BYOC feature lets you orchestrate your own GPU servers while using their managed environment. RunPod offers two modes: a community cloud with lower prices and a secure serverless cloud for enterprises; pricing begins at $1.19/hr for A100 80 GB and $2.17/hr for serverless. Crusoe Cloud provides on‑demand A100 80 GB from $1.95/hr and offers spot instances for $1.30/hr. GMI Cloud’s baseline price of $2.10/hr includes high‑throughput networking and support for containerised workloads. Lambda Labs and other boutique providers fill the mid‑range; they may cost more than Thunder Compute but typically guarantee availability and support.

Expert Insights

• Hyperscalers are expensive: AWS charges $3.02/hr for an A100 (8 GPU p4d instance), while Thunder Compute and Northflank offer similar GPUs for $0.66–$1.76/hr.
  
  
• Marketplace trade‑offs: Vast.ai lists A100 rentals as low as $0.50/hr, but quality and uptime depend on host reliability; always test performance before committing.
  
  
• RunPod vs Lambda: RunPod’s community cloud is cheaper but may have variable availability; Lambda Labs offers stable GPUs and a robust API for persistent workloads.
  
  
• Crusoe’s spot pricing is competitive at $1.30/hr for A100 GPUs, thanks to their flared‑gas powered data centers that lower operating costs.
  
  

Example

Suppose you train a transformer model needing a single A100 80 GB GPU for eight hours. On Thunder Compute you would pay roughly $5.28 (8 × $0.66); on AWS the same job could cost $32.80—a 6× price difference. Over a month of daily training runs, choosing a budget provider could save you thousands of dollars.

Specialized Providers for Training vs Inference

How do GPU rental providers differ for training large models versus serving inference workloads?

Not all GPU clouds are built equally. Training workloads demand sustained high throughput, large memory and often multi‑GPU clusters, while inference prioritises low latency, concurrency and cost‑efficiency. Providers have developed specialised offerings to address these distinct needs.

Training‑Focused Providers

• CoreWeave offers bare‑metal servers with InfiniBand networking for distributed training; this is ideal for high‑performance computing (HPC) but commands premium pricing.
  
  
• Crusoe Cloud provides H100, H200 and MI300X nodes with up to 192 GB memory; the MI300X costs $3.45/hr on demand and emphasises flared‑gas powered data centers. Dedicated clusters reduce latency and energy cost, making them attractive for large‑scale training.
  
  
• GMI Cloud positions itself for startups needing containerised workloads. With starting prices of $2.10/hr and 3.2 Tbps internal networking, it is designed for micro‑batch training and distributed tasks.
  
  
• Thunder Compute focuses on interactive development with one‑click VS Code integration and a library of Docker images, making it easy to spin up training environments quickly.
  
  

Inference‑Optimised Providers

• Clarifai goes further with an integrated Reasoning Engine. It charges around $0.16 per million tokens and achieves more than 500 tokens/s with a 0.3 s time‑to‑first‑token. Advanced techniques like speculative decoding and custom CUDA kernels reduce latency and costs.
  
  
• RunPod offers serverless endpoints and per‑request billing. For example, H100 inference starts at $1.99/hr while community endpoints provide A100 inference at $1.19/hr. It also provides auto‑scale and time‑to‑live controls to shut down idle pods.
  
  
• Northflank provides serverless GPU tasks with per‑second billing and automatically selects spot or on‑demand capacity based on your budget. BYOC allows you to plug your own GPU servers into their platform for inference pipelines.
  
  

Expert Insights

• Training tasks benefit from high‑bandwidth interconnects (e.g., NVLink or InfiniBand) because gradient synchronization across multiple GPUs can be a bottleneck. Check whether your provider offers these networks.
  
  
• Inference often runs best on single GPUs with high clock rates and efficient memory access. Spotting concurrency patterns (e.g., many small requests vs few large ones) helps choose between serverless and dedicated servers.
  
  
• Providers such as Hyperstack use 100 % renewable energy and offer H100 and A100 GPUs; they suit eco‑conscious teams but may not be the cheapest.
  
  
• Clarifai’s Reasoning Engine uses software optimisation (speculative decoding, batching) to double performance and reduce cost by 40 %.
  
  

Example

Imagine deploying a text generation API with 20 requests per second. On RunPod’s serverless platform you only pay for compute time used; combined with caching, you could spend under $100/month. If you instead reserve an on-demand A100 to handle bursts, you may pay $864/month (24 hrs × 30 days × $1.2/hr), regardless of actual load. Clarifai’s reasoning engine can reduce this cost by batching tokens and auto-scaling inference.

Spot Instances, Serverless and BYOC: Strategies for Cost Optimization

What strategies can you use to reduce GPU rental costs without sacrificing reliability?

High GPU costs can derail projects, but several strategies help stretch your budget:

Spot Instances

Spot or preemptible instances are the most obvious way to save. According to Northflank, spot pricing can cut costs by 60–90 % compared with on‑demand. However, these instances may be reclaimed at any moment. To mitigate the risk:

• Use checkpointing and auto‑resubmit features to resume training after interruption.
  
• Run shorter training jobs or inference workloads where restarts have minimal impact.
  
• Combine spot and on‑demand nodes in a cluster so your job survives partial preemptions.
  

Serverless Models

Serverless GPUs allow you to pay by the millisecond. RunPod, Northflank and Clarifai all offer serverless endpoints. This model is ideal for sporadic workloads or API‑based inference because you pay only when requests arrive. Clarifai’s Reasoning Engine automatically batches requests and caches results, further reducing per‑request cost.

Bring‑Your‑Own‑Compute (BYOC)

BYOC allows organisations to connect their own GPU servers to a managed platform. Northflank’s BYOC option integrates self‑hosted GPUs into their orchestrator, enabling unified deployments while avoiding mark‑ups. Clarifai’s compute orchestration supports local runners, which run models on your own hardware or edge devices for offline inference. BYOC is beneficial when you have access to spare GPUs (e.g., idle gaming PCs) or want to keep data on‑premises.

Other Optimisations

• Batching & caching: Group inference requests to maximise GPU utilization and reuse previously computed results.
  
  
• Quantisation & sparsity: Reduce model precision or prune weights to lower compute requirements; Clarifai’s engine leverages these techniques automatically.
  
  
• Calendar capacity: Reserve capacity for specific times (e.g., overnight training) to secure lower rates, as highlighted by some reports.
  
  

Expert Insights

• Use multiple providers to hedge availability risk. If one marketplace’s spot capacity disappears, your scheduler can fall back to another provider.
  
  
• Turn off GPUs between tasks; idle time is one of the largest wastes of money, especially with reserved instances.
  
  
• Track sustained usage discounts on hyperscalers; while AWS is pricey, deep discounts may apply for 3‑year commitments.
  
  
• BYOC requires network connectivity and may impose higher latency for remote users; use it when data locality outweighs latency concerns.
  
  

Clarifai’s Compute Orchestration: Multi‑Cloud Made Simple

How does Clarifai’s compute orchestration and Reasoning Engine solve the compute crunch?

Clarifai is best known for its vision and language models, but it also offers a compute orchestration platform designed to simplify AI deployment across multiple clouds. As GPU shortages and price volatility persist, this layer helps developers schedule training and inference jobs in the most cost-effective environment.

Features at a Glance

• Automatic resource selection: Clarifai abstracts differences among GPU types (A100, H200, B200, MI300X and other accelerators). Its scheduler picks the optimal hardware based on model size, latency requirements and cost.
  
  
• Multi‑cloud & multi‑accelerator: Jobs can run on AWS, Azure, GCP or alternative clouds without rewriting code. The orchestrator handles data movement, security and authentication behind the scenes.
  
  
• Batching, caching & auto‑scaling: The platform automatically batches requests and scales up or down to match demand, reducing per‑request cost.
  
  
• Local runners for edge: Developers can deploy models to on‑premises or edge devices for offline inference. Local runners are managed through the same interface as cloud jobs, providing consistent deployment across environments.
  
  
• Reasoning Engine: Clarifai’s LLM platform costs approximately $0.16 per million tokens and yields over 500 tokens/s with a 0.3 s time‑to‑first‑token, cutting compute costs by about 40 %.
  
  

Expert Insights

• Clarifai’s scheduler not only balances cost but also optimises concurrency and memory footprint. Its custom CUDA kernels and speculative decoding deliver significant speedups.
  
  
• Heterogeneous accelerators are supported. Clarifai can dispatch jobs to XPUs, FPGAs or other hardware when they offer better efficiency or availability.
  
  
• The platform encourages multi-cloud strategies; you can burst to the cheapest provider when demand spikes and fall back to your own hardware when idle.
  
  
• Local runners help meet data‑sovereignty requirements. Sensitive workloads remain on your premises while still benefiting from Clarifai’s deployment pipeline.
  
  

Example

A startup building a multimodal chatbot uses Clarifai’s orchestration to train on H100 GPUs from Northflank and serve inference via B200 instances when more memory is needed. During high demand, the scheduler automatically allocates additional spot GPUs from Thunder Compute. For offline customers, the team deploys the model to local runners. The result is a resilient, cost‑optimised architecture without custom infrastructure code.

Emerging Hardware: H200, B200, MI300X and Beyond

What are the trends in GPU hardware and how do they affect pricing?

GPU innovation has accelerated, bringing chips with higher memory and bandwidth to market. Understanding these trends helps you future‑proof your projects and anticipate cost shifts.

H200 and B200

NVIDIA’s H200 boosts memory from the H100’s 80 GB to 141 GB of HBM3e. This is critical for training large models without splitting them across multiple GPUs. The B200 goes further, offering up to 192 GB HBM3e and 8 TB/s bandwidth, delivering approximately 4× the throughput of an H100 on certain workloads. These chips come at a premium—the B200 can cost anywhere from $2.25/hr to $16/hr depending on the provider—but they reduce the need for data parallelism and speed up training.

AMD MI300X and MI350X

AMD’s MI300X matches H100/H200 memory sizes at 192 GB and offers competitive throughput. Reports note that MI300X and the future MI350X (288 GB) bring more headroom, allowing larger context windows for LLMs. Pricing has softened; some providers list MI300X for $2.50/hr on‑demand and $1.75/hr reserved, undercutting H100 and H200 prices. AMD hardware is becoming popular in neoclouds because of this cost advantage.

Alternative Accelerators and XPUs

Beyond GPUs, specialised XPUs and chips like Google’s TPU v5 and AWS Trainium are gaining traction. Clarifai’s multi‑accelerator support positions it to leverage these alternatives when they offer better price‑performance. For inference tasks, some providers offer RTX 40‑series cards such as the L40S for $0.50–$1/hr; these may suit smaller models or fine‑tuning tasks.

Expert Insights

• More memory enables longer context windows and eliminates the need for sharding; future chips may make multi‑GPU setups obsolete for many applications.
  
  
• Energy efficiency matters. New GPUs use advanced packaging and lower‑power memory, reducing operational cost—an important factor given increasing carbon awareness.
  
  
• Don’t over‑provision: B200 and MI300X are powerful but may be overkill for small models. Estimate your memory needs before choosing.
  
  
• Early adopters often pay higher prices; waiting a few months can yield significant discounts as supply ramps up and competition intensifies.
  
  

How to Choose the Right GPU Provider

How should you evaluate and choose among GPU providers based on your workload and budget?

With so many providers and pricing models, deciding where to run your workloads can be overwhelming. Here are structured considerations to guide your decision:

• Model size & memory: Determine the maximum GPU memory needed. A 70 billion‑parameter LLM might require 80 GB or more; in that case, A100 or H100 is the minimum.
  
  
• Throughput requirements: For training, look at FP16/FP8 TFLOPS and interconnect speeds; for inference, latency and tokens per second matter.
  
  
• Availability & reliability: Check for SLA guarantees, time‑to‑provision and historical uptime. Marketplace rentals may vary.
  
  
• Data egress: Understand how much data you will transfer out of the cloud. Some providers like RunPod have zero egress fees, while hyperscalers charge up to $0.12/GB.
  
  
• Storage & networking: Budget for persistent storage and premium networking, which can add 10–20 % to your total.
  
  
• Licensing: For frameworks like NVIDIA Nemo or proprietary models, ensure the licensing costs are included.
  
  
• Prototype & experimentation: Choose low‑cost on‑demand providers with good developer tooling (e.g., Thunder Compute or Northflank).
  
  
• High‑throughput training: Use HPC‑focused providers like CoreWeave or Crusoe and consider multi‑GPU clusters with high‑bandwidth interconnect.
  
  
• Serverless inference: Opt for RunPod or Clarifai to scale on demand with per‑request billing.
  
  
• Data‑sensitive workloads: BYOC with local runners (e.g., Clarifai) keeps data on‑premises while using managed pipelines.
  
  
• Software ecosystem: Check whether the provider supports your frameworks (PyTorch, TensorFlow, JAX) and containerization.
  
  
• Customer support & community: Good documentation and responsive support reduce friction during deployment.
  
  
• Free credits: Hyperscalers offer free credits that can offset initial costs; factor these into short‑term planning.
  
  

Expert Insights

• Always perform a small test run on a new provider before committing large workloads; measure throughput, latency and reliability.
  
  
• Set up a multi‑provider scheduler (Clarifai or custom) to switch providers automatically based on price and availability.
  
  
• Weigh the long‑term total cost of ownership. Cheap per‑hour rates may come with lower reliability or hidden fees that erode savings.
  
  
• Don’t ignore data locality: training near your data storage reduces egress fees and latency.
  
  

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

• Why are hyperscalers so expensive compared to smaller providers? Big providers invest heavily in global infrastructure, security and compliance, which drives up costs. They also charge for premium networking and support, whereas smaller providers often run leaner operations. However, hyperscalers may offer free credits and better enterprise integration.
  
  
• Are marketplace or community clouds reliable? Marketplaces like Vast.ai or RunPod’s community cloud can offer extremely low prices (A100 as low as $0.50/hr), but reliability depends on the host. Test with non‑critical workloads first and always maintain backups.
  
  
• How do I avoid data egress charges? Keep training and storage in the same cloud. Some providers (RunPod, Thunder Compute) have zero egress fees. Alternatively, use Clarifai’s orchestration to plan tasks where data resides.
  
  
• Is AMD’s MI300X a good alternative to NVIDIA GPUs? Yes. MI300X offers 192 GB memory and competitive throughput and is often cheaper per hour. However, software ecosystem support may vary; check compatibility with your frameworks.
  
  
• Can I deploy models offline? Clarifai’s local runners allow offline inference by running models on local hardware or edge devices. This is ideal for privacy‑sensitive applications or when internet access is unreliable.
  
  

Conclusion

The cloud GPU landscape in 2026 is vibrant, diverse and evolving rapidly. Thunder Compute, Northflank and RunPod offer some of the most affordable A100 and H100 rentals, but each comes with trade-offs in reliability and hidden costs. Clarifai’s compute orchestration stands out as a unifying layer that abstracts hardware differences, enabling multi‑cloud strategies and local deployments. Meanwhile, new hardware like NVIDIA H200/B200 and AMD MI300X is expanding memory and throughput, often at competitive prices.

To secure the best deals, adopt a multi‑provider mindset. Mix on‑demand, spot and BYOC approaches, and leverage serverless and batching to keep utilization high. Ultimately, the cheapest GPU is the one that meets your performance needs without wasting resources. By following the strategies and insights outlined in this guide, you can turn the cloud GPU market’s complexity into an advantage and build scalable, cost-effective AI applications.